Loading
Loading
Technician · trust · ARO
LivePhoto-backed (and structured) findings raise approval rates and cut “I didn’t authorise that” disputes. The system must connect inspection → estimate → customer decision without retyping.
Primary persona: Technician + advisor + customer
The problem
Verbal upsells without evidence erode trust; paper inspection sheets never become recoverable deferred work.
Why it matters
Severity-coded findings create a shared language between tech, advisor, and customer.
Convert-to-line prevents recommended work from dying on a clipboard.
Declined/deferred lines become a revenue pipeline — not forgotten sticky notes.
Portal decisioning keeps authorisation in the system of record for audit and invoicing.
Proof from the live demo
Captured from the seeded multi-tenant demo. Open the same surface with demo credentials.


Stage sequence
Each stage lists the action, the business why, and the intended outcome. This is how we implement and test the product — not marketing fiction.
Action
Tech opens assigned job and records findings with condition/severity in job context.
Why this stage
Findings without a job context cannot feed estimate or audit.
Action
Promote recommended work to priced labour/parts lines with approval state PENDING.
Why this stage
ARO is line-level; unpriced findings do not pay wages.
Action
Advisor shares portal token (SMS/email path); customer approves, declines, or defers per line.
Why this stage
Line-level consent protects disputes and enables honest invoicing.
Action
Deferred lines stay visible for follow-up campaigns and next visit menus.
Why this stage
Declined today is often approved next service — if the system remembers.
Related search intent